Return Home

Why I Signed the CCHD Petition

By Deal W. Hudson

I’ve been asked why I support the Reform CCHD Now petition requesting that the bishops suspend all Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) grants until a thorough review of the program has been completed. A series of reports by Reform CCHD have revealed clear evidence that grants are being given to organizations supporting abortion and same-sex marriage.

Thus far, only two groups have been defunded by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), though another offending organization, the Center for Community Change (CCC), was scrubbed from their Web site (the section removed described it as being worthy of Catholic support).

After the first reports were published, seven dioceses withdrew their participation from the annual November CCHD collection. That collection normally generates, on average, $7-9 million each year, which means the available pool of money over the last ten years was upwards of $90 million. We know that at least some groups working counter to Church teaching on life and marriage have enjoyed access to that funding: Reform CCHD Now asserts that at least 31 problematic organizations remain.

The petition, launched on Wednesday, was made necessary by the dismissive attitude of the USCCB toward the hard evidence linking CCHD grants to organizations supporting abortion and same-sex marriage. USCCB spokeswoman Sr. Mary Ann Walsh admitted she had read only one of the two reports before she rejected their findings.

Furthermore, no subsequent comment by any bishop or USCCB official has addressed the substance of the findings. This is made all the more strange by the fact that the USCCB acted responsively after the first round of Reform CCHD Now reports last August, when they defunded two grantees.

Unfortunately, the USCCB quickly slammed the door shut on any further investigations. That didn’t stop the reform efforts, and the second round of research uncovered troubling new evidence while reconfirming the findings of the original reports.

Some have questioned the petition in light of a statement made by Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life, in which he attests to the pro-life convictions of John Carr, executive director of the USCCB’s Office of Justice, Peace, and Human Development. But none of the reports contain anything about Carr’s personal convictions, only his associations.

The USCCB chose to address the portion of the reports having to do with Carr, responding to an allegation that nobody made. Thus, Father Pavone’s statement has no bearing on the Reform CCHD reports or their subsequent petition. No one is a greater defender of unborn life than Father Pavone, and no one doubts whether he would oppose the USCCB’s spending of Church money to support groups promoting abortion.

When the bishops’ conference attempted to reframe the reports’ findings around the pro-life convictions of Carr, it obscured the real issue. The discussion should be about the actions of the USCCB and the CCHD, not about the convictions of its personnel.  These actions are primarily the grants that have been made for many years to groups subversive to Church teaching, but also the pattern of associations maintained by the CCHD in their efforts to address poverty.

Thus far, the research into the CCHD has uncovered enough questionable grantees in recent years to raise a red flag. As the research goes forward, more troubling evidence will very likely come to light. Why not simply step back from the grant-making, find out what went wrong, fix it, and get back to work? That’s all the petition asks, and I support it.

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Google Buzz
  • RSS
  • Tumblr

4 Responses to Why I Signed the CCHD Petition

  1. Peter Wingate says:

    At last year’s National March for Life, I asked a priest how in the world the bishops could have funded for so many years those organizations that support and advocate positions and political candidates contrary to the Catholic Church. He told me that he just had to believe that the bishops were not aware. Well, given the chance to become aware, what do they do? And, given that they are now informed, is it that the bishops simply choose to overlook the bad because they approve of the good that they think those groups do? The answers to these questions tell us all we need to know about their intentions.

  2. stephen says:

    I think it is deplorable that the bishops have chosen to shut the case down against the CCHD….however, it is also important to realize that there are only a few bad bishops who have somehow hijacked the system, and there are many bishops who stand for life, and are trying to make changes. However, our voices need to be as loud as possible in condemnation of this terrrible travesty of justice, by which the church is hurting herself, her mission, and the thousands of non-Catholics who look to the church for wisdom, and who are now confused because of the double standard. Thank you so much Catholic Advocate for publishing this…it is a very important but seldom heard message that needs to ring loudly for it to have any affect. Pax Christi


  3. Deal Hudson says:

    Peter & Stephen, thanks for your comments. It’s hard to understand why more Catholics aren’t up in arms about this issue. Perhaps Catholics are still living in a clerical age where they believe it to be disobedient to question anything “Father” does. In this case, however, the staff at the USCCB and CCHD aren’t religious, although some are, but they are supposedly supervised by the bishops, which brings us back to possibility of a clerical attitude among the laity.

  4. Dawn Elizabeth Slike says:

    Given the seeds of rebellion which seem to have been planted soon after Humanae Vitae within the Church, I frankly think there are a number of clergy and hierarchical leaders who think it’s not worth the trouble to fight evil anymore and think compromise is necessary for progress, which of course is ludicrous. Teach truth, and teach undiluted truth. And for God’s sake, and for the sake of all His children, quit fleecing trusting souls of their hard-earned money and squandering it on poisonous causes.

    The current Pope soon after he took his position suggested that the Church would become somewhat smaller but cleaner. Isn’t that what we want, a purer Church?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *